Digital Resurrections: The Ethics of Deepfakes

Digital Resurrections: The Ethics of Deepfakes

As artificial intelligence advances, deepfake technology—the ability to create hyper-realistic manipulated videos and images—has begun to resurrect deceased public figures digitally, raising profound ethical, legal, and cultural questions about rewriting history and the legacy of the dead.

What Are Deepfakes of the Dead?

Deepfakes use AI algorithms to synthesize visual and audio content, often seamlessly inserting faces or voices into new contexts. Recently, this technology has been applied to create videos of deceased celebrities and historical figures, effectively bringing them "back to life" on screen. For instance, AI-generated portrayals of late stars like Robin Williams have surfaced, sometimes in ways that their families find troubling or disrespectful.

The Current Landscape and Legal Ambiguities

Unlike defamation laws that protect the living, the dead generally cannot be libeled—meaning legal protections against false or damaging portrayals do not apply after death. This creates a legal gray area where creators can produce deepfakes of deceased individuals without direct legal consequences, even if the content is misleading or harmful to the individual's legacy.

OpenAI, a major AI developer, has incorporated some ethical guardrails in its systems; for example, its Sora 2 AI model refuses to generate video deepfakes of certain deceased public figures like former President Jimmy Carter (who died in 2024) but has permitted content featuring others like Robin Williams. However, the deceased have no agency or consent in how their likeness is used, unlike living individuals who may set parameters on their digital representations.

Ethical and Social Concerns

The use of deepfakes to recreate dead celebrities has sparked significant backlash from families and the public. Zelda Williams, daughter of Robin Williams, has publicly voiced concerns about the emotional impact and disrespect of such digital resurrections. The technology raises questions about consent, the sanctity of a person's legacy, and the potential for misinformation or manipulation of historical narratives.

In some cases, deepfakes of dead people have been used satirically or politically, such as fabricating videos of Richard Nixon advocating for modern social causes, which can distort public memory and political discourse.

Broader Implications of Deepfake Technology

While deepfakes of deceased figures attract attention, the technology has wider societal impacts. More than 90% of detected deepfakes are pornographic and often weaponized for harassment, such as the creation of non-consensual explicit imagery. The spread of deepfake content has led to new laws, like the 2025 bipartisan bill signed in New Jersey, requiring the removal of harmful deepfake materials upon request.

Moreover, AI-generated deepfakes pose threats to public figures, including judges and politicians, fueling harassment and violent threats. The blending of deepfakes with misinformation campaigns risks undermining trust in media and institutions.

Industry and Regulatory Responses

• AI companies are beginning to implement guardrails to restrict the generation of deepfakes of certain individuals, especially the deceased. However, enforcement remains inconsistent, and the technology is widely accessible.

• Legislators worldwide are crafting laws to combat malicious deepfake uses, but regulating post-mortem digital likeness rights is still uncharted territory.

• Families and estates are increasingly vocal about protecting the dignity and legacy of their deceased relatives, calling for industry-wide ethical standards.

Visualizing the Issue

Images relevant to this topic include:

• Screenshots of AI-generated deepfake videos of deceased figures like Robin Williams.
• Photos of activists and family members speaking out against deepfake misuse.
• Diagrams illustrating how deepfake technology synthesizes images and voices.
• Logos of AI companies developing or regulating deepfake tools.

Conclusion: Rewriting the Past with Caution

Deepfakes of dead people open a new frontier where technology collides with ethics, law, and memory. While the technology can be fascinating and creatively used, it also risks rewriting history, distorting legacies, and causing emotional harm. As AI evolves, society faces urgent questions about consent, respect for the deceased, and safeguarding truth in digital media.

Ongoing debates among technologists, lawmakers, families, and the public will shape how this powerful technology is governed to balance innovation with responsibility.

---

This article reflects the latest developments as of October 2025, drawing on recent reports from TechCrunch, NBC News, and legal analyses of deepfake regulations.